Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 29.06.2025 12:35
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Russia can stop this any time.
Thank you.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Advice for trying GLP-1 drugs for weight loss from a doctor who's been there - NPR
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
What are some effective strategies for getting more upvotes on Quora?
What’s next?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Summer McIntosh Swims 3:54.18 To Shatter 400 Freestyle World Record By 1.2 Seconds - SwimSwam